So Mormon Dialogue has a thread about this book, with these posts as the highlight (and lowlight respectively):You can find my original review here. And the entire thread is found here.After only making it to the second paragraph of Deane’s review, I wanted him to defend the claim of there being “new research” in "Turley et al"s book. Can Deane identify just five new bits of information found in
Continue reading at the original source →